connectiop.blogg.se

Harry potter film 2016
Harry potter film 2016








harry potter film 2016

harry potter film 2016

However, the early numbers for Manchester are a fantastic sign and both the film’s brilliant leading man, Casey Affleck, and its once-disgraced writer/director, Kenneth Lonergan, should feel optimistic about their Oscar chances. Still, there has been some concern that not even die-hard independent film fans would go see a film about grief as the nation continues to grapple with the aftermath such a divisive and corrosive election season. Seems tiny, but as Variety points out, “that amounts to the fourth-highest per-screen average for any film released in 2016.” Admittedly, if anyone were going to flock to see Manchester by the Sea, it would be the dialed-in film communities of New York and Los Angeles. Screenings of Manchester by the Sea in just four theaters in New York and Los Angeles made $241,230.

harry potter film 2016

Manchester by the Sea, Kenneth Lonergan’s Sundance hit and Oscar hopeful, only opened on a few screens this week-but it out-performed all expectations.

HARRY POTTER FILM 2016 MOVIE

Superman made a mind-boggling $166 million.) But while box office experts debate over whether Fantastic Beasts did well enough this week (more on that), a much smaller movie opened to some surprisingly phenomenal numbers. (By comparison, Marvel’s Doctor Strange made $85 million domestically its opening weekend, while WB’s Batman v. over the weekend and $143.3 million overseas. But the film did decently, pulling in $75 million domestically for Warner Bros. With all the fanfare, positive reviews, studio backing, and built-in Harry Potter fanbase behind it, the most shocking result for Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them would have been if it hadn’t done well at the box office.










Harry potter film 2016